Tag: Opinion

  • How will Good ever beat a bloody good Victim?

    How will Good ever beat a bloody good Victim?

    This week, I saw a woman leave an overall friendly Facebook group, because a handful of people were offended with a word in a question she posted and had picked it to pieces. So, she announced with much flourish and emotion that now she too was offended with the overall vibe of the group was was flouncing out of the room to share her thoughts elsewhere. wow.

    These days you can read any social media post, or indeed news article and find someone who takes offence with it, disagrees with it and shares that feeling. So often, in life and on the internet when someone throws a line out like “she’s a narcissist” or “she’s a loose woman” we act like it’s a permanent sticker. Instead of saying the person who said it is the person with the bad personality or a spiteful mouth or quite often just a little person being a bully. At best we could say they are ‘having a bad day’ perhaps.

    Blaming the victim – Being the victim, wearing the labels they throw at us, these are all ways that a the bad guys from psychopaths, narcissists to garden variety bullies get away with it, and we let them. We help them silence their victims, and turn the victims into the perpetrator. 

    It’s this same ideology that lets bad leaders not only win, but carry on winning, it’s that same ideology that contributes to widening inequality, more mildly referred to as the ‘cost of living crises’. 

    Let’s all do our best to be rubber, not glue, and ask more questions about who is doing what to whom. 

  • This is the house that Jill built

    This is the house that Jill built

    When you think about building a house or a home what kind of images of white pretty houses surrounded by picket fences might spring to mind? or perhaps your vision is a double story brick house.  Or maybe the more ambitious think of Provencal mansions by sea … and then or perhaps the mind turns to interiors. The sofa, the wall colours, maybe you like herringbone floorboards or plush white carpets.  Bathrooms with steam showers and walk in wardrobes. 

    Much like those renovation or house building shows on TV, the story ends, the success is had when the house is built, the décor has been installed, the pillows fluffed and fresh flowers and a cheese board rests on the kitchen bench. A vanilla candle burns somewhere.  What happens after that ?

    I had a home that I had put effort into décor wise, with what I could afford, and with things I had spent a lot of time searching for, that were beautiful but not necessarily expensive.  I said what surrounds me matters, I don’t like things to be ugly, it doesn’t have to be flashy or slick or even new, but there should be a level of care in the way it’s put together, it should feel warm and cosy, things matching or artfully mismatched. Old good quality things that are rustic and authentic instead of new and cheap or just worn out.  Orderly clutter conceals things that can’t be fixed, a preference over the look of sparseness. Minimalism is different to ‘not enough; it’s all in the type of layout.   I had a home that I built with hope, with dreams and borrowed money, with generosity towards myself and my new baby, so the love would surround her in every way. 

    What is often forgotten is the house you build with the company you keep, the habits you give energy to, the words you use and of course your thoughts. I wonder sometimes of the power of thoughts because I have met some wonderfully negative and jealous people who have built lives for themselves that outwardly seem fantastic.  Perhaps though, the house they really live in doesn’t extend to the material world, the house you really live in is in your mind. You hang the wallpaper, design the pattern on the curtains, choose to see only the good, somehow repel the troublemakers, the negativity bearers, the liars, the firemen and women who waterboard you with their jealousy and feast on the schadenfreude when you trip and fall. 

    The world we live in is much like a house, the biggest share house ever. We try to ignore or remove the housemates who steal our food from the fridge, set fire to the kitchen and raid our bedrooms for our treasures. We are sometimes initially enthralled by those larger-than-life characters who seemed to promise entertainment and lightness when we first met them, but soon you realise it’s mostly a façade and they are unreliable and honestly, just between us, more trouble than they are worth.  Then there are the ones promising to help, to make the world better, they say they have best of intentions, without really specifying what it is they intend to happen. And of course, that’s because they have no intention of actually helping you or the world, their actual intention is that you can’t see them stabbing you in the back while they help themselves to your life.

    So, when I think about building a house these days, me and the world we live in should both think beyond the bricks and mortar, soft furnishings and Italian made lamps.  To not accept a house viewed through a filter, a house that looks real, but is really just a curtain painted with the picture of house covering a broken reality.  To give long and hard consideration to the words we use, the words we want to hear, the actions we want to receive, the energy we give out and how we share the resources we have amongst us, whilst also taking a long hard look to how we work alongside each other so that everyone has not just a seat at the table, but a full plate of food too. 

  • Letter to the Editor #3

    Letter to the Editor #3

    https://www.afr.com/politics/albanese-must-say-no-to-bailing-out-andrews-20230403-p5cxqi

    https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/chalmers-jets-off-with-no-real-growth-strategy-20230412-p5czv2

    April 14, 2023

    There was some concerning use of words and punctuation in the editorials “Albanese must say no to bailing out Andrews” (April 12) and “Chalmers jets off with no real growth strategy” (April 13).

    Daniel Andrews has invested a significant amount in infrastructure for Melbourne and Victoria; the use of the word “profligate”, which means recklessly extravagant or wasteful, seems shortsighted. Was the Sydney Opera House profligate at the time?

    This is infrastructure that will benefit future generations. As for the comment about Victoria’s credit rating, why are the rating agencies still in business after they failed so miserably in the lead-up to the GFC?

    The use of punctuation on the words “care economy” was disrespectful to the work, “care” and sacrifices parents put in (not to mention all the other types of carers). This attitude is then reflected in flagging NDIS for “out of control” spending. As for who will pay for it – didn’t the Productivity Commission model this as paying for itself? If they were wrong about this, what else are they wrong about?

    Is it ever possible to remove ideology from data? At the very least outdated ideology? The ideology that we are all ‘individuals’, the ideology or is it propaganda that shouts down the suggestion that we are not with the very simplistic opposite – ‘socialism’, the ideology that women must be forced, cornered even, into care duties by the deprivation of their own resources. And to then dismiss that work as ‘worthless’, to have it looked down upon, is just so disrespectful, I’d like to say it’s ‘un-Australian’ but unfortunately it seems it is very much not.

  • Letter to the Editor #1

    Letter to the Editor #1

    https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/leaders/boards-sound-alarm-on-labor-spending-intervention-20230207-p5ciqc

    February 10, 2023

    Boards sound alarm on Labor spending, intervention” (February 10) really has to be the final straw in responses to Jim Chalmers’ essay.

    The reporting and commentary in The Australian Financial Review has been, quite frankly, embarrassing – for this newspaper, for the business “leaders”, and for Australia, as it confirms the suspicion that we are five to 10 years behind the rest of the world.

    The free-market, neoliberal, Milton Friedman-led ideology has been over for ages. Even Friedman’s school acknowledges it’s over. If nothing else, the shellacking received by the Liberals at the last election should have told you it’s over.

    The relentless bleating for “lower taxes” is the only idea business leaders have, the apparent solution to everything. No wonder we’re in trouble.

  • Letter to the Editor #2

    Letter to the Editor #2

    March 6, 2023

    https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/workplace/rich-women-a-social-revolution-worth-celebrating-20230301-p5colw

    As a professional woman, the above article appeared to strike all the right notes, until it didn’t and then became rather concerning.. 

    You state: 

    “The steady surge in female participation has also been a source of economic growth and greater prosperity for all Australians. That is worth underlining … to guard against zero-sum gender thinking.”

    And then proceed to champion zero-sum gender thinking:

    There are also fresh questions about helping women to balance work and family responsibilities. Labor’s policy of extending generous childcare subsidies to wealthy families will supposedly remove financial barriers to higher participation by women with children. Yet, this has been questioned by Productivity Commission research in 2015 that found the boost to participation rates would be “small” due to the different work and family choices women make.

    Where are the policies designed to help men balance work and family responsibilities?  Is sperm no longer required to make a child? I seem to have missed those headlines..

    The current childcare policy was perniciously designed to discourage women from advancing in the workplace, whilst simultaneously lining the pockets of a small group of men who own thousands of childcare ‘businesses’, and makes every women who goes to work the star of her very own performance of Alice in Wonderland  – 

    “My dear, here we must run as fast as we can, just to stay in place. And if you wish to go anywhere you must run twice as fast as that.”

    And then, neatly summed up in one sentence, the reason why Australia fails it’s women so miserably ..

    Nobody can question the benefits of Australian women’s expanded role in the market economy.  – and yet you then go on to question exactly that with:

    But there is a legitimate debate to be had about the extent to which taxpayers should underwrite a woman’s rightful place in the workforce. That just goes to show how big the social revolution has been.

    Whereas, I think the real question to be asked, that I think all women would like answered, is 

    “to what extent should women continue to be subsidising the creation of taxpayers, to the detriment of their own wellbeing, both professionally and financially.” 

    And what will you do if we stop?